Luxembourg vs Malawi: Wheat — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Luxembourg
-25 % change on previous year
in 2023
Malawi
-100 % change on previous year
in 2008
Luxembourg rank
114th
Malawi rank
117th
Wheat — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time
- Luxembourg
- Malawi
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports -25 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Malawi, a difference of 75 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Malawi ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 114th and Malawi ranks 117th of 125 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wheat — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Luxembourg or Malawi?
- Luxembourg, at -25 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in wheat — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Luxembourg and Malawi?
- 75 % change on previous year, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Malawi?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2008.
- How do Luxembourg and Malawi rank globally for wheat — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
- Luxembourg ranks 114th and Malawi ranks 117th of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wheat — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Wheat — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.