Netherlands (Kingdom of the) vs Yugoslav SFR: Wheat — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate

Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2.86 % change on previous year
in 2023
Yugoslav SFR
3.34 % change on previous year
in 1991
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank
35th
Yugoslav SFR rank
32nd

Wheat — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
  • Yugoslav SFR
-2002040196219922023

How they compare

Yugoslav SFR currently reports 3.34 % change on previous year against 2.86 % change on previous year in Netherlands (Kingdom of the), a difference of 0.48 % change on previous year.

That makes Yugoslav SFR's figure about 1.2 times Netherlands (Kingdom of the)'s.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ahead.

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 35th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 32nd of 125 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Netherlands (Kingdom of the) averaged higher in 3 and Yugoslav SFR in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Netherlands (Kingdom of the) Yugoslav SFR Difference Ahead
1960s 3.57 % change on previous year 0.7756 % change on previous year 2.8 % change on previous year Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
1970s -0.5037 % change on previous year -2.42 % change on previous year 1.92 % change on previous year Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
1980s 0.4143 % change on previous year -0.0553 % change on previous year 0.4696 % change on previous year Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
1990s -5.13 % change on previous year 2.27 % change on previous year 7.4 % change on previous year Yugoslav SFR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wheat — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Netherlands (Kingdom of the) or Yugoslav SFR?
Yugoslav SFR, at 3.34 % change on previous year against 2.86 % change on previous year in Netherlands (Kingdom of the) as of 1991.
What is the difference in wheat — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Yugoslav SFR?
0.48 % change on previous year, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Yugoslav SFR?
30 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 1991.
How do Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for wheat — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 35th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 32nd of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Wheat — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) vs Yugoslav SFR: Wheat — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/wheat-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/yugoslav-sfr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/wheat-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/yugoslav-sfr/">Netherlands (Kingdom of the) vs Yugoslav SFR: Wheat — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wheat — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,055 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Wheat — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.