Australia and New Zealand vs European Union (27): Wheat — Burning crop residues

Australia and New Zealand
0.4374 kt
in 2050
European Union (27)
0.6651 kt
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand rank
7th
European Union (27) rank
9th

Wheat — Burning crop residues over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • European Union (27)
0.20.40.60.8196120052050

How they compare

European Union (27) currently reports 0.6651 kt against 0.4374 kt in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.2277 kt.

That makes European Union (27)'s figure about 1.5 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, European Union (27) has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 7th and European Union (27) ranks 9th of 125 countries.

European Union (27) has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand European Union (27) Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2249 kt 0.6871 kt 0.4622 kt European Union (27)
1970s 0.2471 kt 0.6204 kt 0.3732 kt European Union (27)
1980s 0.3082 kt 0.6155 kt 0.3073 kt European Union (27)
1990s 0.2598 kt 0.6496 kt 0.3898 kt European Union (27)
2000s 0.3484 kt 0.6778 kt 0.3293 kt European Union (27)
2010s 0.3487 kt 0.6819 kt 0.3332 kt European Union (27)
2020s 0.3383 kt 0.6671 kt 0.3288 kt European Union (27)
2030s 0.4286 kt 0.6683 kt 0.2397 kt European Union (27)
2050s 0.4374 kt 0.6651 kt 0.2277 kt European Union (27)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wheat — burning crop residues, Australia and New Zealand or European Union (27)?
European Union (27), at 0.6651 kt against 0.4374 kt in Australia and New Zealand as of 2050.
What is the difference in wheat — burning crop residues between Australia and New Zealand and European Union (27)?
0.2277 kt, with European Union (27) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and European Union (27)?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and New Zealand and European Union (27) rank globally for wheat — burning crop residues?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 7th and European Union (27) ranks 9th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Wheat — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs European Union (27): Wheat — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/wheat-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/european-union-27/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/wheat-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/european-union-27/">Australia and New Zealand vs European Union (27): Wheat — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wheat — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
169 places, 9,743 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).