Lithuania vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Wheat — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), per square kilometre

Lithuania
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Lithuania rank
2nd
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
2nd

Wheat — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Lithuania
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
0000196119922023

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 181.6 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.

Lithuania ranks 2nd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 2nd of 110 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Lithuania
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Lithuania
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Lithuania
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wheat — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), per square kilometre, Lithuania or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Lithuania, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in wheat — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), per square kilometre between Lithuania and Sub-Saharan Africa?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Sub-Saharan Africa?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Lithuania and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for wheat — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), per square kilometre?
Lithuania ranks 2nd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 2nd of 110 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Wheat — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Wheat — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/wheat-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/wheat-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/sub-saharan-africa/">Lithuania vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Wheat — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wheat — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
112 places, 5,963 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Wheat — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.