Australia and New Zealand vs Timor-Leste: Woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Australia and New Zealand
-76.89 % change on previous year
in 2024
Timor-Leste
-75.58 % change on previous year
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
80th
Timor-Leste rank
78th
Woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Timor-Leste currently reports -75.58 % change on previous year against -76.89 % change on previous year in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 1.31 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Timor-Leste ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 80th and Timor-Leste ranks 78th of 175 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Timor-Leste in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 42.2 % change on previous year | 58.7 % change on previous year | 16.5 % change on previous year | Timor-Leste |
| 2000s | 25.06 % change on previous year | 67.09 % change on previous year | 42.03 % change on previous year | Timor-Leste |
| 2010s | 59.31 % change on previous year | 12.08 % change on previous year | 47.23 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2020s | -71.46 % change on previous year | -86.49 % change on previous year | 15.03 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate, Australia and New Zealand or Timor-Leste?
- Timor-Leste, at -75.58 % change on previous year against -76.89 % change on previous year in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate between Australia and New Zealand and Timor-Leste?
- 1.31 % change on previous year, with Timor-Leste ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Timor-Leste?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Timor-Leste rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 80th and Timor-Leste ranks 78th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Woody savanna — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.