Austria vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate

Austria
-100 % change on previous year
in 2021
China, Hong Kong SAR
-100 % change on previous year
in 2017
Austria rank
99th
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
99th

Woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time

  • Austria
  • China, Hong Kong SAR
-2000200400600800199120062021

How they compare

Austria currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

Across all 11 years both countries report, China, Hong Kong SAR has been ahead every year.

Austria ranks 99th and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 99th of 175 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria China, Hong Kong SAR Difference Ahead
1990s -16.67 % change on previous year 0.2937 % change on previous year 16.96 % change on previous year China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s -100 % change on previous year 383.34 % change on previous year 483.34 % change on previous year China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s -100 % change on previous year -100 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate, Austria or China, Hong Kong SAR?
Austria, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2021.
What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate between Austria and China, Hong Kong SAR?
0 % change on previous year, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and China, Hong Kong SAR?
11 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2015.
How do Austria and China, Hong Kong SAR rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate?
Austria ranks 99th and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 99th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burned-area-annual-growth-rate/austria/china-hong-kong-sar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burned-area-annual-growth-rate/austria/china-hong-kong-sar/">Austria vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 5,371 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Woody savanna — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.