Austria vs Falkland Islands (Malvinas): Woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Austria
-100 % change on previous year
in 2021
Falkland Islands (Malvinas)
-100 % change on previous year
in 2007
Austria rank
99th
Falkland Islands (Malvinas) rank
99th
Woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time
- Austria
- Falkland Islands (Malvinas)
How they compare
Austria currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Falkland Islands (Malvinas), a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Falkland Islands (Malvinas) has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 99th and Falkland Islands (Malvinas) ranks 99th of 175 countries.
Falkland Islands (Malvinas) has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate, Austria or Falkland Islands (Malvinas)?
- Austria, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Falkland Islands (Malvinas) as of 2021.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate between Austria and Falkland Islands (Malvinas)?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Falkland Islands (Malvinas)?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1996.
- How do Austria and Falkland Islands (Malvinas) rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate?
- Austria ranks 99th and Falkland Islands (Malvinas) ranks 99th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Woody savanna — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.