Chad vs Germany: Woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Chad
-100 % change on previous year
in 2020
Germany
-100 % change on previous year
in 2023
Chad rank
99th
Germany rank
99th
Woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time
- Chad
- Germany
How they compare
Chad currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Germany, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Germany ahead.
Chad ranks 99th and Germany ranks 99th of 175 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Germany | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 52.54 % change on previous year | -5.87 % change on previous year | 58.41 % change on previous year | Chad |
| 2000s | 21.52 % change on previous year | -74.51 % change on previous year | 96.03 % change on previous year | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate, Chad or Germany?
- Chad, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Germany as of 2020.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate between Chad and Germany?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Germany?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2009.
- How do Chad and Germany rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate?
- Chad ranks 99th and Germany ranks 99th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Woody savanna — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.