China, Hong Kong SAR vs Lithuania: Woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate

China, Hong Kong SAR
-100 % change on previous year
in 2017
Lithuania
-100 % change on previous year
in 2021
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
99th
Lithuania rank
99th

Woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Lithuania
-2000200400600800199120062021

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Lithuania, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Lithuania ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 99th and Lithuania ranks 99th of 175 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 0.4405 % change on previous year -25 % change on previous year 25.44 % change on previous year China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 233.86 % change on previous year -37.85 % change on previous year 271.7 % change on previous year China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s -96.08 % change on previous year -50 % change on previous year 46.07 % change on previous year Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate, China, Hong Kong SAR or Lithuania?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Lithuania as of 2017.
What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate between China, Hong Kong SAR and Lithuania?
0 % change on previous year, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Lithuania?
11 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2015.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Lithuania rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 99th and Lithuania ranks 99th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Lithuania: Woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burned-area-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burned-area-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/lithuania/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Lithuania: Woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 5,371 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Woody savanna — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.