Costa Rica vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate

Costa Rica
171.2 % change on previous year
in 2024
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
8.47 % change on previous year
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
18th
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
16th

Woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
-1000100200300199120072024

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 171.2 % change on previous year against 8.47 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 162.73 % change on previous year.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 20.2 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 19 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 18th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 16th of 175 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 3 and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1631 % change on previous year 31.45 % change on previous year 31.29 % change on previous year Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 36.66 % change on previous year -6.22 % change on previous year 42.88 % change on previous year Costa Rica
2010s 9.21 % change on previous year -1.6 % change on previous year 10.81 % change on previous year Costa Rica
2020s 55.68 % change on previous year 3 % change on previous year 52.68 % change on previous year Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate, Costa Rica or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Costa Rica, at 171.2 % change on previous year against 8.47 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate between Costa Rica and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
162.73 % change on previous year, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Costa Rica and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate?
Costa Rica ranks 18th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 16th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burned-area-annual-growth-rate/costa-rica/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burned-area-annual-growth-rate/costa-rica/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Costa Rica vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 5,371 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Woody savanna — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.