Isle of Man vs Norway: Woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate
Isle of Man
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Norway
-100 % change on previous year
in 2020
Isle of Man rank
99th
Norway rank
99th
Woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time
- Isle of Man
- Norway
How they compare
Isle of Man currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Norway, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.
Isle of Man ranks 99th and Norway ranks 99th of 175 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Isle of Man | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -16.67 % change on previous year | -16.54 % change on previous year | 0.1315 % change on previous year | Norway |
| 2000s | -100 % change on previous year | -100 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate, Isle of Man or Norway?
- Isle of Man, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Norway as of 2001.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate between Isle of Man and Norway?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Isle of Man ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Isle of Man and Norway?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2001.
- How do Isle of Man and Norway rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate?
- Isle of Man ranks 99th and Norway ranks 99th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Woody savanna — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.