New Zealand vs Sao Tome and Principe: Woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate
New Zealand
-100 % change on previous year
in 2022
Sao Tome and Principe
-100 % change on previous year
in 2024
New Zealand rank
99th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
99th
Woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate over time
- New Zealand
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
New Zealand ranks 99th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 99th of 175 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate, New Zealand or Sao Tome and Principe?
- New Zealand, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2022.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate between New Zealand and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0 % change on previous year, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1996.
- How do New Zealand and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for woody savanna — burned area, annual growth rate?
- New Zealand ranks 99th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 99th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burned Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Woody savanna — Burned Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.