Afghanistan vs Belgium: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Afghanistan
0 ha
in 2024
Belgium
0 ha
in 2024
Afghanistan rank
98th
Belgium rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Afghanistan
- Belgium
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Belgium, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 98th and Belgium ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Belgium in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Belgium | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.71 ha | 6.46 ha | 5.24 ha | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 6.46 ha | 6.46 ha | Belgium |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Afghanistan or Belgium?
- Afghanistan, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Belgium as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Afghanistan and Belgium?
- 0 ha, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Belgium?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Afghanistan and Belgium rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Afghanistan ranks 98th and Belgium ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.