Afghanistan vs Botswana: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Afghanistan
0 ha
in 2024
Botswana
0 ha
in 2024
Afghanistan rank
98th
Botswana rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Afghanistan
- Botswana
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Botswana, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Botswana has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 98th and Botswana ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Botswana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 83.59 ha | 618,712 ha | 618,629 ha | Botswana |
| 2000s | 11.71 ha | 95,476 ha | 95,465 ha | Botswana |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Afghanistan or Botswana?
- Afghanistan, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Botswana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Afghanistan and Botswana?
- 0 ha, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Botswana?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Afghanistan and Botswana rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Afghanistan ranks 98th and Botswana ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.