Afghanistan vs Burkina Faso: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Afghanistan
0 ha
in 2024
Burkina Faso
0 ha
in 2024
Afghanistan rank
98th
Burkina Faso rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Afghanistan
- Burkina Faso
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Burkina Faso has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 98th and Burkina Faso ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Burkina Faso | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 83.59 ha | 161,911 ha | 161,827 ha | Burkina Faso |
| 2000s | 11.71 ha | 17,039 ha | 17,027 ha | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 2.14 ha | 2.14 ha | Burkina Faso |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Afghanistan or Burkina Faso?
- Afghanistan, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Burkina Faso as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Afghanistan and Burkina Faso?
- 0 ha, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Burkina Faso?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Afghanistan and Burkina Faso rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Afghanistan ranks 98th and Burkina Faso ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.