Afghanistan vs Latvia: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Afghanistan
0 ha
in 2024
Latvia
0 ha
in 2024
Afghanistan rank
98th
Latvia rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Afghanistan
- Latvia
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Latvia, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 98th and Latvia ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 97.68 ha | 357 ha | 259.32 ha | Latvia |
| 2000s | 11.71 ha | 1,558 ha | 1,546 ha | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 414.2 ha | 414.2 ha | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 21.57 ha | 21.57 ha | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Afghanistan or Latvia?
- Afghanistan, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Afghanistan and Latvia?
- 0 ha, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Latvia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Afghanistan and Latvia rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Afghanistan ranks 98th and Latvia ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.