Armenia vs Botswana: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Armenia
0 ha
in 2024
Botswana
0 ha
in 2024
Armenia rank
98th
Botswana rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Armenia
- Botswana
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Botswana, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Botswana ahead.
Armenia ranks 98th and Botswana ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Botswana in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Botswana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 152.8 ha | 722,377 ha | 722,224 ha | Botswana |
| 2000s | 89.35 ha | 95,476 ha | 95,387 ha | Botswana |
| 2010s | 55.87 ha | 0 ha | 55.87 ha | Armenia |
| 2020s | 137.5 ha | 0 ha | 137.5 ha | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Armenia or Botswana?
- Armenia, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Botswana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Armenia and Botswana?
- 0 ha, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Botswana?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Armenia and Botswana rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Armenia ranks 98th and Botswana ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.