Australia and New Zealand vs Southern Africa: Woody savanna — Burned Area

Australia and New Zealand
96,001 ha
in 2024
Southern Africa
77,987 ha
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
20th
Southern Africa rank
22nd

Woody savanna — Burned Area over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Southern Africa
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M10.0M199020072024

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 96,001 ha against 77,987 ha in Southern Africa, a difference of 18,014 ha.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.2 times Southern Africa's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 20th and Southern Africa ranks 22nd of 220 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Southern Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 3.40 million ha 995,687 ha 2.40 million ha Australia and New Zealand
2000s 814,114 ha 203,020 ha 611,094 ha Australia and New Zealand
2010s 368,197 ha 37,838 ha 330,360 ha Australia and New Zealand
2020s 214,064 ha 34,995 ha 179,069 ha Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Australia and New Zealand or Southern Africa?
Australia and New Zealand, at 96,001 ha against 77,987 ha in Southern Africa as of 2024.
What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Australia and New Zealand and Southern Africa?
18,014 ha, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Southern Africa?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Southern Africa rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 20th and Southern Africa ranks 22nd of 220 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Southern Africa: Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burned-area-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/southern-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burned-area-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/southern-africa/">Australia and New Zealand vs Southern Africa: Woody savanna — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Woody savanna — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
273 places, 9,329 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.