Australia and New Zealand vs Western Africa: Woody savanna — Burned Area

Australia and New Zealand
96,001 ha
in 2024
Western Africa
327,858 ha
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
20th
Western Africa rank
17th

Woody savanna — Burned Area over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Western Africa
05.0M10.0M15.0M199020072024

How they compare

Western Africa currently reports 327,858 ha against 96,001 ha in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 231,857 ha.

That makes Western Africa's figure about 3.4 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Western Africa ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 20th and Western Africa ranks 17th of 220 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Western Africa in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Western Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 3.40 million ha 6.01 million ha 2.61 million ha Western Africa
2000s 814,114 ha 1.43 million ha 617,340 ha Western Africa
2010s 368,197 ha 296,551 ha 71,647 ha Australia and New Zealand
2020s 214,064 ha 239,863 ha 25,798 ha Western Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Australia and New Zealand or Western Africa?
Western Africa, at 327,858 ha against 96,001 ha in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Australia and New Zealand and Western Africa?
231,857 ha, with Western Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Western Africa?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Western Africa rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 20th and Western Africa ranks 17th of 220 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Western Africa: Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burned-area-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/western-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burned-area-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/western-africa/">Australia and New Zealand vs Western Africa: Woody savanna — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Woody savanna — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
273 places, 9,329 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.