Austria vs Burkina Faso: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Austria
0 ha
in 2024
Burkina Faso
0 ha
in 2024
Austria rank
98th
Burkina Faso rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Austria
- Burkina Faso
How they compare
Austria currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Austria ranks 98th and Burkina Faso ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 2 and Burkina Faso in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Burkina Faso | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 20.49 ha | 161,911 ha | 161,891 ha | Burkina Faso |
| 2000s | 71.05 ha | 17,039 ha | 16,968 ha | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 25.83 ha | 2.14 ha | 23.69 ha | Austria |
| 2020s | 4.31 ha | 0 ha | 4.31 ha | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Austria or Burkina Faso?
- Austria, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Burkina Faso as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Austria and Burkina Faso?
- 0 ha, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Burkina Faso?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Austria and Burkina Faso rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Austria ranks 98th and Burkina Faso ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.