Austria vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Woody savanna — Burned Area

Austria
0 ha
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR
0 ha
in 2024
Austria rank
98th
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
98th

Woody savanna — Burned Area over time

  • Austria
  • China, Hong Kong SAR
0200400600199020072024

How they compare

Austria currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 0 ha.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

Austria ranks 98th and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 98th of 220 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 1 and China, Hong Kong SAR in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria China, Hong Kong SAR Difference Ahead
1990s 20.49 ha 120.45 ha 99.96 ha China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 71.05 ha 183.74 ha 112.68 ha China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 25.83 ha 70.66 ha 44.83 ha China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 4.31 ha 0 ha 4.31 ha Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Austria or China, Hong Kong SAR?
Austria, at 0 ha against 0 ha in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2024.
What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Austria and China, Hong Kong SAR?
0 ha, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and China, Hong Kong SAR?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Austria and China, Hong Kong SAR rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
Austria ranks 98th and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burned-area-fao-tier-1/austria/china-hong-kong-sar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burned-area-fao-tier-1/austria/china-hong-kong-sar/">Austria vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Woody savanna — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Woody savanna — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
273 places, 9,329 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.