Bahamas vs Zimbabwe: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Bahamas
6,898 ha
in 2024
Zimbabwe
6,271 ha
in 2024
Bahamas rank
52nd
Zimbabwe rank
54th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Bahamas
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 6,898 ha against 6,271 ha in Zimbabwe, a difference of 627 ha.
That makes Bahamas's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Bahamas ranks 52nd and Zimbabwe ranks 54th of 220 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8,845 ha | 167,022 ha | 158,177 ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 7,525 ha | 29,024 ha | 21,499 ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 5,943 ha | 7,984 ha | 2,041 ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 4,349 ha | 2,889 ha | 1,460 ha | Bahamas |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Bahamas or Zimbabwe?
- Bahamas, at 6,898 ha against 6,271 ha in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Bahamas and Zimbabwe?
- 627 ha, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Zimbabwe?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Bahamas and Zimbabwe rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Bahamas ranks 52nd and Zimbabwe ranks 54th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.