Belgium-Luxembourg vs Mauritius: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Belgium-Luxembourg
0 ha
in 1999
Mauritius
0 ha
in 2024
Belgium-Luxembourg rank
98th
Mauritius rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Mauritius
How they compare
Belgium-Luxembourg currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Mauritius, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 98th and Mauritius ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Belgium-Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Belgium-Luxembourg or Mauritius?
- Belgium-Luxembourg, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Mauritius as of 1999.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Belgium-Luxembourg and Mauritius?
- 0 ha, with Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Mauritius?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Mauritius rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 98th and Mauritius ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.