Belgium vs Latvia: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Belgium
0 ha
in 2024
Latvia
0 ha
in 2024
Belgium rank
98th
Latvia rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Belgium
- Latvia
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Latvia, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 98th and Latvia ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.46 ha | 1,558 ha | 1,551 ha | Latvia |
| 2010s | 6.46 ha | 414.2 ha | 407.73 ha | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 21.57 ha | 21.57 ha | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Belgium or Latvia?
- Belgium, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Belgium and Latvia?
- 0 ha, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Latvia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Latvia rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Belgium ranks 98th and Latvia ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.