Belgium vs Rwanda: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Belgium
0 ha
in 2024
Rwanda
21.37 ha
in 2024
Belgium rank
98th
Rwanda rank
96th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Belgium
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 21.37 ha against 0 ha in Belgium, a difference of 21.37 ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Rwanda ahead.
Belgium ranks 98th and Rwanda ranks 96th of 220 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.46 ha | 448.66 ha | 442.2 ha | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 6.46 ha | 10.69 ha | 4.22 ha | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 12.82 ha | 12.82 ha | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Belgium or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 21.37 ha against 0 ha in Belgium as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Belgium and Rwanda?
- 21.37 ha, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Rwanda?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Rwanda rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Belgium ranks 98th and Rwanda ranks 96th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.