Botswana vs Rwanda: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Botswana
0 ha
in 2024
Rwanda
21.37 ha
in 2024
Botswana rank
98th
Rwanda rank
96th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Botswana
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 21.37 ha against 0 ha in Botswana, a difference of 21.37 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 98th and Rwanda ranks 96th of 220 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 618,712 ha | 3,288 ha | 615,425 ha | Botswana |
| 2000s | 95,476 ha | 448.66 ha | 95,028 ha | Botswana |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 10.69 ha | 10.69 ha | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 12.82 ha | 12.82 ha | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Botswana or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 21.37 ha against 0 ha in Botswana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Botswana and Rwanda?
- 21.37 ha, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Rwanda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Botswana and Rwanda rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Botswana ranks 98th and Rwanda ranks 96th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.