Burkina Faso vs Namibia: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Burkina Faso
0 ha
in 2024
Namibia
0 ha
in 2024
Burkina Faso rank
98th
Namibia rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Burkina Faso
- Namibia
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Namibia, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 98th and Namibia ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 161,911 ha | 99,564 ha | 62,347 ha | Burkina Faso |
| 2000s | 17,039 ha | 16,889 ha | 149.36 ha | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 2.14 ha | 19.26 ha | 17.12 ha | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Burkina Faso or Namibia?
- Burkina Faso, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Burkina Faso and Namibia?
- 0 ha, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Namibia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Burkina Faso and Namibia rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Burkina Faso ranks 98th and Namibia ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.