Canada vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Woody savanna — Burned Area

Canada
2.22 million ha
in 2024
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
8.86 million ha
in 2024
Canada rank
5th
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
5th

Woody savanna — Burned Area over time

  • Canada
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
020.0M40.0M60.0M199020072024

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 8.86 million ha against 2.22 million ha in Canada, a difference of 6.63 million ha.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 4.0 times Canada's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Canada ranks 5th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 5th of 220 countries.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 695,706 ha 36.70 million ha 36.00 million ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 691,900 ha 15.29 million ha 14.60 million ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 1.11 million ha 8.32 million ha 7.21 million ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 2.15 million ha 8.57 million ha 6.42 million ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Canada or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 8.86 million ha against 2.22 million ha in Canada as of 2024.
What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Canada and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
6.63 million ha, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Canada and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
Canada ranks 5th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 5th of 220 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burned-area-fao-tier-1/canada/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burned-area-fao-tier-1/canada/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Canada vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Woody savanna — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Woody savanna — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
273 places, 9,329 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.