China, Hong Kong SAR vs Namibia: Woody savanna — Burned Area

China, Hong Kong SAR
0 ha
in 2024
Namibia
0 ha
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
98th
Namibia rank
98th

Woody savanna — Burned Area over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Namibia
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k199020072024

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Namibia, a difference of 0 ha.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Namibia ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 98th and Namibia ranks 98th of 220 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 120.45 ha 99,564 ha 99,444 ha Namibia
2000s 183.74 ha 16,889 ha 16,706 ha Namibia
2010s 70.66 ha 19.26 ha 51.4 ha China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 0 ha 0 ha 0 ha

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, China, Hong Kong SAR or Namibia?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Namibia as of 2024.
What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between China, Hong Kong SAR and Namibia?
0 ha, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Namibia?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Namibia rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 98th and Namibia ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Namibia: Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burned-area-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burned-area-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/namibia/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Namibia: Woody savanna — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Woody savanna — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
273 places, 9,329 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.