Cuba vs Philippines: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Cuba
16,250 ha
in 2024
Philippines
19,249 ha
in 2024
Cuba rank
41st
Philippines rank
40th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Cuba
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 19,249 ha against 16,250 ha in Cuba, a difference of 2,999 ha.
That makes Philippines's figure about 1.2 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 41st and Philippines ranks 40th of 220 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 3 and Philippines in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17,490 ha | 11,479 ha | 6,011 ha | Cuba |
| 2000s | 16,190 ha | 11,701 ha | 4,489 ha | Cuba |
| 2010s | 12,087 ha | 13,428 ha | 1,341 ha | Philippines |
| 2020s | 21,961 ha | 11,126 ha | 10,835 ha | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Cuba or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 19,249 ha against 16,250 ha in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Cuba and Philippines?
- 2,999 ha, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Philippines?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Philippines rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Cuba ranks 41st and Philippines ranks 40th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.