Czechia vs Turkmenistan: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Czechia
0 ha
in 2024
Turkmenistan
0 ha
in 2024
Czechia rank
98th
Turkmenistan rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Czechia
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
Czechia ranks 98th and Turkmenistan ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 3 and Turkmenistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7 ha | 330.95 ha | 323.94 ha | Turkmenistan |
| 2000s | 25.84 ha | 20.68 ha | 5.16 ha | Czechia |
| 2010s | 17.23 ha | 0 ha | 17.23 ha | Czechia |
| 2020s | 8.61 ha | 0 ha | 8.61 ha | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Czechia or Turkmenistan?
- Czechia, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Turkmenistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Czechia and Turkmenistan?
- 0 ha, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Turkmenistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Czechia and Turkmenistan rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Czechia ranks 98th and Turkmenistan ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.