Eritrea vs Grenada: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Eritrea
0 ha
in 2024
Grenada
0 ha
in 2024
Eritrea rank
98th
Grenada rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Eritrea
- Grenada
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Grenada, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 98th and Grenada ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 2 and Grenada in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 688.3 ha | 0.632 ha | 687.67 ha | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 30.39 ha | 2.14 ha | 28.26 ha | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 2.14 ha | 2.14 ha | Grenada |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Eritrea or Grenada?
- Eritrea, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Grenada as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Eritrea and Grenada?
- 0 ha, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Grenada?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Eritrea and Grenada rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Eritrea ranks 98th and Grenada ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.