Eritrea vs Kazakhstan: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Eritrea
0 ha
in 2024
Kazakhstan
0 ha
in 2024
Eritrea rank
98th
Kazakhstan rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Eritrea
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 98th and Kazakhstan ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 688.3 ha | 50,050 ha | 49,362 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 30.39 ha | 4,796 ha | 4,766 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 484.86 ha | 484.86 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 1,116 ha | 1,116 ha | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Eritrea or Kazakhstan?
- Eritrea, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Eritrea and Kazakhstan?
- 0 ha, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Eritrea and Kazakhstan rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Eritrea ranks 98th and Kazakhstan ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.