Estonia vs Kazakhstan: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Estonia
0 ha
in 2024
Kazakhstan
0 ha
in 2024
Estonia rank
98th
Kazakhstan rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Estonia
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Estonia ranks 98th and Kazakhstan ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 159.66 ha | 45,390 ha | 45,231 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 766.99 ha | 4,796 ha | 4,029 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 97.11 ha | 484.86 ha | 387.74 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 21.58 ha | 1,116 ha | 1,094 ha | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Estonia or Kazakhstan?
- Estonia, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Estonia and Kazakhstan?
- 0 ha, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Kazakhstan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Estonia and Kazakhstan rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Estonia ranks 98th and Kazakhstan ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.