Estonia vs Turkmenistan: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Estonia
0 ha
in 2024
Turkmenistan
0 ha
in 2024
Estonia rank
98th
Turkmenistan rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Estonia
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
Estonia ranks 98th and Turkmenistan ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 3 and Turkmenistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 159.66 ha | 329.01 ha | 169.35 ha | Turkmenistan |
| 2000s | 766.99 ha | 20.68 ha | 746.31 ha | Estonia |
| 2010s | 97.11 ha | 0 ha | 97.11 ha | Estonia |
| 2020s | 21.58 ha | 0 ha | 21.58 ha | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Estonia or Turkmenistan?
- Estonia, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Turkmenistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Estonia and Turkmenistan?
- 0 ha, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Turkmenistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Estonia and Turkmenistan rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Estonia ranks 98th and Turkmenistan ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.