Ethiopia vs Pakistan: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Ethiopia
1,282 ha
in 2024
Pakistan
1,137 ha
in 2024
Ethiopia rank
66th
Pakistan rank
69th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Ethiopia
- Pakistan
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 1,282 ha against 1,137 ha in Pakistan, a difference of 145 ha.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Ethiopia has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 66th and Pakistan ranks 69th of 220 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.72 million ha | 350.02 ha | 1.72 million ha | Ethiopia |
| 2000s | 256,549 ha | 368.22 ha | 256,181 ha | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 7,370 ha | 111.59 ha | 7,258 ha | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 5,421 ha | 1,099 ha | 4,322 ha | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Ethiopia or Pakistan?
- Ethiopia, at 1,282 ha against 1,137 ha in Pakistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Ethiopia and Pakistan?
- 145 ha, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Pakistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Ethiopia and Pakistan rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Ethiopia ranks 66th and Pakistan ranks 69th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.