Gambia vs Slovenia: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Gambia
0 ha
in 2024
Slovenia
0 ha
in 2024
Gambia rank
98th
Slovenia rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Gambia
- Slovenia
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Slovenia, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Gambia ahead.
Gambia ranks 98th and Slovenia ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 2 and Slovenia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 32,072 ha | 54.67 ha | 32,017 ha | Gambia |
| 2000s | 5,442 ha | 30.08 ha | 5,412 ha | Gambia |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 68.85 ha | 68.85 ha | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 167.84 ha | 167.84 ha | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Gambia or Slovenia?
- Gambia, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Slovenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Gambia and Slovenia?
- 0 ha, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Slovenia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Gambia and Slovenia rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Gambia ranks 98th and Slovenia ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.