Gambia vs Uruguay: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Gambia
0 ha
in 2024
Uruguay
0 ha
in 2024
Gambia rank
98th
Uruguay rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Gambia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Uruguay, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Gambia ahead.
Gambia ranks 98th and Uruguay ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 30,100 ha | 787.08 ha | 29,313 ha | Gambia |
| 2000s | 5,442 ha | 441.02 ha | 5,001 ha | Gambia |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 47.2 ha | 47.2 ha | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 300.35 ha | 300.35 ha | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Gambia or Uruguay?
- Gambia, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Uruguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Gambia and Uruguay?
- 0 ha, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Uruguay?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Gambia and Uruguay rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Gambia ranks 98th and Uruguay ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.