Grenada vs Namibia: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Grenada
0 ha
in 2024
Namibia
0 ha
in 2024
Grenada rank
98th
Namibia rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Grenada
- Namibia
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Namibia, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Namibia ahead.
Grenada ranks 98th and Namibia ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.8848 ha | 99,564 ha | 99,563 ha | Namibia |
| 2000s | 2.14 ha | 16,889 ha | 16,887 ha | Namibia |
| 2010s | 2.14 ha | 19.26 ha | 17.12 ha | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Grenada or Namibia?
- Grenada, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Grenada and Namibia?
- 0 ha, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Namibia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Grenada and Namibia rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Grenada ranks 98th and Namibia ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.