Iraq vs Norway: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Iraq
0 ha
in 2024
Norway
0 ha
in 2024
Iraq rank
98th
Norway rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Iraq
- Norway
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Norway, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Iraq ahead.
Iraq ranks 98th and Norway ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 2 and Norway in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,937 ha | 375.33 ha | 3,561 ha | Iraq |
| 2000s | 1,046 ha | 1,032 ha | 13.69 ha | Iraq |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 99.27 ha | 99.27 ha | Norway |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Iraq or Norway?
- Iraq, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Norway as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Iraq and Norway?
- 0 ha, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Norway?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Iraq and Norway rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Iraq ranks 98th and Norway ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.