Ireland vs Uzbekistan: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Ireland
0 ha
in 2024
Uzbekistan
0 ha
in 2024
Ireland rank
98th
Uzbekistan rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Ireland
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Ireland currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Ireland ranks 98th and Uzbekistan ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ireland averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 45.33 ha | 5,581 ha | 5,536 ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 115.24 ha | 1,136 ha | 1,021 ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 99.15 ha | 0 ha | 99.15 ha | Ireland |
| 2020s | 25.86 ha | 0 ha | 25.86 ha | Ireland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Ireland or Uzbekistan?
- Ireland, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Ireland and Uzbekistan?
- 0 ha, with Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Uzbekistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Ireland and Uzbekistan rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Ireland ranks 98th and Uzbekistan ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.