Isle of Man vs Namibia: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Isle of Man
0 ha
in 2024
Namibia
0 ha
in 2024
Isle of Man rank
98th
Namibia rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Isle of Man
- Namibia
How they compare
Isle of Man currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Namibia, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Isle of Man ranks 98th and Namibia ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Isle of Man | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0457 ha | 99,564 ha | 99,564 ha | Namibia |
| 2000s | 0.2211 ha | 16,889 ha | 16,889 ha | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 19.26 ha | 19.26 ha | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Isle of Man or Namibia?
- Isle of Man, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Isle of Man and Namibia?
- 0 ha, with Isle of Man ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Isle of Man and Namibia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Isle of Man and Namibia rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Isle of Man ranks 98th and Namibia ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.