Isle of Man vs Rwanda: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Isle of Man
0 ha
in 2024
Rwanda
21.37 ha
in 2024
Isle of Man rank
98th
Rwanda rank
96th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Isle of Man
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 21.37 ha against 0 ha in Isle of Man, a difference of 21.37 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Isle of Man ranks 98th and Rwanda ranks 96th of 220 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Isle of Man | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0457 ha | 3,288 ha | 3,288 ha | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 0.2211 ha | 448.66 ha | 448.44 ha | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 10.69 ha | 10.69 ha | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 12.82 ha | 12.82 ha | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Isle of Man or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 21.37 ha against 0 ha in Isle of Man as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Isle of Man and Rwanda?
- 21.37 ha, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Isle of Man and Rwanda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Isle of Man and Rwanda rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Isle of Man ranks 98th and Rwanda ranks 96th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.