Israel vs Lesotho: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Israel
0 ha
in 2024
Lesotho
0 ha
in 2024
Israel rank
98th
Lesotho rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Israel
- Lesotho
How they compare
Israel currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Lesotho, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Lesotho has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 98th and Lesotho ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 104.56 ha | 2,021 ha | 1,916 ha | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 0.4808 ha | 274.98 ha | 274.5 ha | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 4.29 ha | 4.29 ha | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Israel or Lesotho?
- Israel, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Lesotho as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Israel and Lesotho?
- 0 ha, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Lesotho?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Israel and Lesotho rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Israel ranks 98th and Lesotho ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.