Japan vs New Zealand: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Japan
364.74 ha
in 2024
New Zealand
365.08 ha
in 2024
Japan rank
82nd
New Zealand rank
81st
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Japan
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 365.08 ha against 364.74 ha in Japan, a difference of 0.34 ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 82nd and New Zealand ranks 81st of 220 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 450.99 ha | 50.5 ha | 400.49 ha | Japan |
| 2000s | 675.51 ha | 36.64 ha | 638.87 ha | Japan |
| 2010s | 1,002 ha | 6.45 ha | 995.67 ha | Japan |
| 2020s | 480.64 ha | 386.39 ha | 94.25 ha | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Japan or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 365.08 ha against 364.74 ha in Japan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Japan and New Zealand?
- 0.34 ha, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and New Zealand?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Japan and New Zealand rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Japan ranks 82nd and New Zealand ranks 81st of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.