Kazakhstan vs Namibia: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Kazakhstan
0 ha
in 2024
Namibia
0 ha
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
98th
Namibia rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Kazakhstan
- Namibia
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Namibia, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Namibia ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 98th and Namibia ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 45,390 ha | 111,219 ha | 65,829 ha | Namibia |
| 2000s | 4,796 ha | 16,889 ha | 12,093 ha | Namibia |
| 2010s | 484.86 ha | 19.26 ha | 465.6 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 1,116 ha | 0 ha | 1,116 ha | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Kazakhstan or Namibia?
- Kazakhstan, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Kazakhstan and Namibia?
- 0 ha, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Namibia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Namibia rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Kazakhstan ranks 98th and Namibia ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.