Kazakhstan vs Rwanda: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Kazakhstan
0 ha
in 2024
Rwanda
21.37 ha
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
98th
Rwanda rank
96th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Kazakhstan
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 21.37 ha against 0 ha in Kazakhstan, a difference of 21.37 ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 98th and Rwanda ranks 96th of 220 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 45,390 ha | 3,842 ha | 41,549 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 4,796 ha | 448.66 ha | 4,348 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 484.86 ha | 10.69 ha | 474.17 ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 1,116 ha | 12.82 ha | 1,103 ha | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Kazakhstan or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 21.37 ha against 0 ha in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Kazakhstan and Rwanda?
- 21.37 ha, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Rwanda?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Rwanda rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Kazakhstan ranks 98th and Rwanda ranks 96th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.