Kenya vs Turkmenistan: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Kenya
21.37 ha
in 2024
Turkmenistan
0 ha
in 2024
Kenya rank
97th
Turkmenistan rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Kenya
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 21.37 ha against 0 ha in Turkmenistan, a difference of 21.37 ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kenya ahead.
Kenya ranks 97th and Turkmenistan ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 31,285 ha | 329.01 ha | 30,956 ha | Kenya |
| 2000s | 5,955 ha | 20.68 ha | 5,934 ha | Kenya |
| 2010s | 848.39 ha | 0 ha | 848.39 ha | Kenya |
| 2020s | 363.29 ha | 0 ha | 363.29 ha | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Kenya or Turkmenistan?
- Kenya, at 21.37 ha against 0 ha in Turkmenistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Kenya and Turkmenistan?
- 21.37 ha, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Turkmenistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Kenya and Turkmenistan rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Kenya ranks 97th and Turkmenistan ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.