Latvia vs Namibia: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Latvia
0 ha
in 2024
Namibia
0 ha
in 2024
Latvia rank
98th
Namibia rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Latvia
- Namibia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Namibia, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Namibia ahead.
Latvia ranks 98th and Namibia ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 357 ha | 111,219 ha | 110,862 ha | Namibia |
| 2000s | 1,558 ha | 16,889 ha | 15,332 ha | Namibia |
| 2010s | 414.2 ha | 19.26 ha | 394.94 ha | Latvia |
| 2020s | 21.57 ha | 0 ha | 21.57 ha | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Latvia or Namibia?
- Latvia, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Latvia and Namibia?
- 0 ha, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Namibia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Namibia rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Latvia ranks 98th and Namibia ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.