Mali vs Namibia: Woody savanna — Burned Area
Mali
0 ha
in 2024
Namibia
0 ha
in 2024
Mali rank
98th
Namibia rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burned Area over time
- Mali
- Namibia
How they compare
Mali currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Namibia, a difference of 0 ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mali ahead.
Mali ranks 98th and Namibia ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 498,643 ha | 99,564 ha | 399,079 ha | Mali |
| 2000s | 87,004 ha | 16,889 ha | 70,115 ha | Mali |
| 2010s | 160.35 ha | 19.26 ha | 141.09 ha | Mali |
| 2020s | 4.28 ha | 0 ha | 4.28 ha | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burned area, Mali or Namibia?
- Mali, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burned area between Mali and Namibia?
- 0 ha, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Namibia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Mali and Namibia rank globally for woody savanna — burned area?
- Mali ranks 98th and Namibia ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.